Original Research

Revisiting decoloniality for more effective research and evaluation

Fanie Cloete, Christelle Auriacombe
African Evaluation Journal | Vol 7, No 1 | a363 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/aej.v7i1.363 | © 2019 Fanie Cloete, Christelle Auriacombe | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 19 November 2018 | Published: 24 June 2019

About the author(s)

Fanie Cloete, School of Public Management, Governance and Public Policy, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
Christelle Auriacombe, School of Public Management, Governance and Public Policy, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg

Abstract

Background: There is increasing global resistance against a perceived Eurocentric value hegemony in knowledge generation, implementation and evaluation. A persistent colonial value mindset is accused of imposing outdated and inappropriate policies on former colonised and other countries and needs to be changed to more appropriate processes and results to improve conditions in those countries in the 21st century.

Objectives: This article intends to summarise some lessons from the impact of historical colonial value systems and practices in current knowledge generation, transfer and application processes and results in Africa (especially in South Africa). The objective is to identify concrete directions towards ‘decolonising’ research and evaluation processes and products to be more relevant, appropriate and, therefore, more effective to achieve sustainable empowerment and other desired developmental outcomes not only in lesser developed countries but also in traditionally more developed Western nations.

Method: A comparative literature review was undertaken to identify and assess the current state of the debate on the perceived need to decolonise research and evaluation practices in different contexts. The Africa-rooted evaluation movement was used as a case study for this purpose.

Results: The current decoloniality discourse is ineffective and needs to be taken in another direction. Mainstreaming culturally sensitive and responsive, contextualised participatory research and evaluation designs and methodology implementation in all facets and at all stages of research and evaluation projects has the potential to fulfil the requirements and demands of the research and evaluation decoloniality movement.

Conclusion: This will improve the effectiveness of research and evaluation processes and results.


Keywords

decoloniality; decolonisation; culturally responsive research; culturally responsive evaluation; Africa-rooted evaluation

Metrics

Total abstract views: 6097
Total article views: 10675

 

Crossref Citations

1. Conquering acceptability: A study of stakeholder inclusion practices in evaluation processes in francophone West African Countries
Bidossessi M.G. Dossou Kpanou, Jori N. Hall, Kathleen D. Kelsey
Evaluation and Program Planning  vol: 110  first page: 102534  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102534

2. Science potential for development in Africa not yet fully realised
Fanie Cloete
South African Journal of Science  vol: 117  issue: 5/6  year: 2021  
doi: 10.17159/sajs.2021/9390

3. Factors inhibiting the maturity and praxis of Made in Africa Evaluation
Takunda J. Chirau, Mokgophana Ramasobana
African Evaluation Journal  vol: 10  issue: 1  year: 2022  
doi: 10.4102/aej.v10i1.627

4. Decolonizing Community Development Evaluation in Rakhine State, Myanmar
Leanne M. Kelly, Phyo Pyae Thida (aka Sophia) Htwe
American Journal of Evaluation  vol: 45  issue: 1  first page: 68  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1177/10982140221146140

5. Community-based development and indigenous evaluation in Africa: insights from Ghana
Evans Sakyi Boadu, Isioma Ile
Journal of Contemporary African Studies  vol: 43  issue: 1  first page: 87  year: 2025  
doi: 10.1080/02589001.2024.2414023

6. An evidence gap map on Made in Africa Evaluation approaches: Exploration of the achievements
Tebogo E. Fish
African Evaluation Journal  vol: 10  issue: 1  year: 2022  
doi: 10.4102/aej.v10i1.626

7. Whole-of-community and intersectoral interventions that address alcohol-related harms: A scoping review
Ulla Walmisley, Michelle De Jong, Asha George, Ida Okeyo, Carmen Späth, Nandi Siegfried, Nadine Harker, Mark Tomlinson, Tanya Doherty
Global Public Health  vol: 19  issue: 1  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1080/17441692.2024.2357211

8. Beyond the Buzzword: A Framework for an Indigenous Relational Evaluation in Traditional Communities in Ghana
Evans S. Boadu, Isioma Ile
American Journal of Evaluation  vol: 45  issue: 3  first page: 467  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1177/10982140211048459

9. Beyond Western Standards: Decolonial Perspectives on Religious and Cultural Dress Codes in South African Professional Environments
Ndidzulafhi Mudau
E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences  first page: 3007  year: 2025  
doi: 10.38159/ehass.20256129

10. Editorial – 2019: Omniscience of monitoring and evaluation
Mark A. Abrahams
African Evaluation Journal  vol: 7  issue: 1  year: 2019  
doi: 10.4102/aej.v7i1.433

11. Decolonisation of the nursing curriculum: an evidence-based perspective
Mynesha Sankar
Evidence Based Nursing  first page: ebnurs-2024-104180  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1136/ebnurs-2024-104180

12. A scoping review of commissioning practices used in the evaluation of Indigenous health and wellbeing programs: Protocol article
Summer May Finlay, Amohia Boulton, Helen Simpson, Bronwyn Fredericks, Yvette Roe, Jenni Judd, James A Smith, Janaya Pender, Margaret Cargo
Evaluation Journal of Australasia  vol: 23  issue: 4  first page: 220  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1177/1035719X231200050

13. Where are the values in evaluating palliative care? Learning from community-based palliative care provision
Sandy Whitelaw, Devi Vijay, David Clark
Palliative Care and Social Practice  vol: 18  year: 2024  
doi: 10.1177/26323524241287223

14. Indigenous Made in Africa Evaluation Frameworks: Addressing Epistemic Violence and Contributing to Social Transformation
Bagele Chilisa, Donna M. Mertens
American Journal of Evaluation  vol: 42  issue: 2  first page: 241  year: 2021  
doi: 10.1177/1098214020948601

15. How to identify epistemic injustice in global health research funding practices: a decolonial guide
Emilie S Koum Besson
BMJ Global Health  vol: 7  issue: 4  first page: e008950  year: 2022  
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008950

16. Vérité en sciences : nécessité de repenser la recherche partenariale nord-sud
Nonvignon Marius Kêdoté
Droit, Santé et Société  vol: Vol. 12  issue: 1-2  first page: 34  year: 2025  
doi: 10.54695/dsso.121.0034

17. History Education in Ethiopia Post-1991: Rethinking the Nation’s History in the Context of “Decolonization” Debates
Jon Abbink
Cahiers d'études africaines  vol: 247  first page: 487  year: 2022  
doi: 10.4000/etudesafricaines.38994

18. Factors affecting the integration of cultural values into evaluation: Indigenous perspectives
Evans S. Boadu
African Evaluation Journal  vol: 11  issue: 1  year: 2023  
doi: 10.4102/aej.v11i1.702