Original Research
Evaluation2 – Evaluating the national evaluation system in South Africa: What has been achieved in the first 5 years?
Submitted: 03 April 2019 | Published: 28 August 2019
About the author(s)
Ian Goldman, Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME), Pretoria, South Africa; and, Centre for Learning on Evaluation and Results, Anglophone Africa, Johannesburg, South AfricaCarol N. Deliwe, Department of Basic Education, Pretoria, South Africa
Stephen Taylor, Department of Basic Education, Pretoria, South Africa
Zeenat Ishmail, Strategic Management Information, Western Cape Provincial Government, Cape Town, South Africa
Laila Smith, Centre for Learning on Evaluation and Results, Anglophone Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa
Thokozile Masangu, Evaluation and Research, Department of Rural Development and Land Reform, Pretoria, South Africa
Christopher Adams, Provincial Budget Analysis, Intergovernmental Relations, National Treasury, Pretoria, South Africa
Gillian Wilson, National Treasury, Pretoria, South Africa
Dugan Fraser, Centre for Learning on Evaluation and Results, Anglophone Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa
Annette Griessel, Policy, Stakeholder Coordination and Knowledge Management, Department of Women, Pretoria, South Africa
Cara Waller, Twende Mbele – an African M&E government partnership, Johannesburg, South Africa
Siphesihle Dumisa, Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME), Pretoria, South Africa
Alyna Wyatt, Evaluation for Development, Genesis Analytics, Johannesburg, South Africa
Jamie Robertsen, Evaluation for Development, Genesis Analytics, Johannesburg, South Africa
Abstract
Background: South Africa has pioneered national evaluation systems (NESs) along with Canada, Mexico, Colombia, Chile, Uganda and Benin. South Africa’s National Evaluation Policy Framework (NEPF) was approved by Cabinet in November 2011. An evaluation of the NES started in September 2016.
Objectives: The purpose of the evaluation was to assess whether the NES had had an impact on the programmes and policies evaluated, the departments involved and other key stakeholders; and to determine how the system needs to be strengthened.
Method: The evaluation used a theory-based approach, including international benchmarking, five national and four provincial case studies, 112 key informant interviews, a survey with 86 responses and a cost-benefit analysis of a sample of evaluations.
Results: Since 2011, 67 national evaluations have been completed or are underway within the NES, covering over $10 billion of government expenditure. Seven of South Africa’s nine provinces have provincial evaluation plans and 68 of 155 national and provincial departments have departmental evaluation plans. Hence, the system has spread widely but there are issues of quality and the time it takes to do evaluations. It was difficult to assess use but from the case studies it did appear that instrumental and process use were widespread. There appears to be a high return on evaluations of between R7 and R10 per rand invested.
Conclusion: The NES evaluation recommendations on strengthening the system ranged from legislation to strengthen the mandate, greater resources for the NES, strengthening capacity development, communication and the tracking of use.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 8394Total article views: 10284
Crossref Citations
1. Country-led monitoring and evaluation systems through the lens of participatory governance and co-production: Implications for a Made in Africa Evaluation approach
Candice Morkel, Adeline Sibanda
African Evaluation Journal vol: 10 issue: 1 year: 2022
doi: 10.4102/aej.v10i1.622
2. Evaluating the evaluators: What have we learned from “neutral assessments” of the Canadian federal evaluation function?
Isabelle Bourgeois, Stéphanie Maltais
Canadian Public Administration vol: 65 issue: 1 first page: 122 year: 2022
doi: 10.1111/capa.12454
3. Decolonising national evaluation systems
Ian Goldman, Candice Morkel, Edoé D. Agbodjan, Thokozile G. Molaiwa
African Evaluation Journal vol: 12 issue: 2 year: 2024
doi: 10.4102/aej.v12i2.731
4. Advancing a Performance Management Tool for Service Delivery in Local Government
Ilse Schoeman, James Chakwizira
Administrative Sciences vol: 13 issue: 2 first page: 31 year: 2023
doi: 10.3390/admsci13020031
5. An overview of the provincial evaluation system of the Western Cape Government of South Africa as a response to the evaluation of the National Evaluation System
Zeenat Ishmail, Victoria L. Tully
African Evaluation Journal vol: 8 issue: 1 year: 2020
doi: 10.4102/aej.v8i1.425
6. Impact evaluation and synthesis – how far are they being used in low- and middle-income countries?
Richard Manning, Ian Goldman, Gonzalo Hernández Licona
Journal of Development Effectiveness vol: 15 issue: 2 first page: 148 year: 2023
doi: 10.1080/19439342.2022.2102056
7. What works for poor farmers? Insights from South Africa’s national policy evaluations
Sarah A. Chapman, Katherine Tjasink, Johann Louw
African Evaluation Journal vol: 9 issue: 1 year: 2021
doi: 10.4102/aej.v9i1.548
8. A descriptive narrative on the current situation against the gold standards regarding institutionalisation of national monitoring and evaluation system for Botswana and Zimbabwe
Panganai F. Makadzange
African Evaluation Journal vol: 10 issue: 1 year: 2022
doi: 10.4102/aej.v10i1.578
9. Social justice, corporate social responsibility and sustainable development in South Africa
Emem Anwana
HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies vol: 76 issue: 3 year: 2020
doi: 10.4102/hts.v76i3.6095
10. Development of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Four National Programs Addressing Mother and Child Health in Cote d’Ivoire: Qualitative Analysis of the Emergence and Formulation Process
Esme Marie Laure Essis, Wambi Maurice Evariste Yaméogo, Olivier Gbènamblo Sossa, Daouda Doukouré, Rachidatou Compaoré, Djoukou Olga Denise Kpebo, Marie Laurette Agbré-Yacé, Joseph Aka, Issiaka Tiembré, Blaise Sondo, Seni Kouanda
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy vol: Volume 16 first page: 699 year: 2023
doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S377617
11. Editorial – 2019: Omniscience of monitoring and evaluation
Mark A. Abrahams
African Evaluation Journal vol: 7 issue: 1 year: 2019
doi: 10.4102/aej.v7i1.433