Original Research - Special Collection: SAMEA 7th Biennial Conference 2019

State of monitoring and evaluation in Anglophone Africa: Centre for Learning on Evaluation and Results in Anglophone Africa’s reflections

Dugan I. Fraser, Candice Morkel
African Evaluation Journal | Vol 8, No 1 | a505 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/aej.v8i1.505 | © 2020 Dugan I. Fraser, Candice Morkel | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 02 July 2020 | Published: 06 November 2020

About the author(s)

Dugan I. Fraser, Centre for Learning on Evaluation and Results in Anglophone Africa (CLEAR-AA), Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management, Wits School of Governance, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Candice Morkel, Centre for Learning on Evaluation and Results in Anglophone Africa (CLEAR-AA), Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management, Wits School of Governance, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa


Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

This article is an overview of what the Centre for Learning on Evaluation and Results in Anglophone Africa (CLEAR-AA) is currently learning in its work implementing monitoring and evaluation (M&E) capacity strengthening programmes in our partner countries. This article is based on the reflections drawn from the authors’ experiences and the work of CLEAR-AA in strengthening M&E systems across the continent. It serves as a contribution to larger ongoing strategic conversations about how to promote evidence-informed decision-making for better development outcomes. The article begins with a discussion on systems broadly and M&E systems in particular, with a specific focus on some of the historical roots of the current ways in which M&E is defined and implemented in African systems of governance. We continue to discuss the various elements that come into play in establishing and institutionalising M&E systems, in particular the ‘M&E Market’ and the demand for evidence, where we also challenge the notion of the unidirectional demand and supply chain of evaluation. The institutional architecture within which M&E systems operate is next discussed, and how the formal (and informal) laws, policies, boundaries and rules continue to provide some degree of leverage in support of these systems. The article finally addresses two key elements of developing and sustaining M&E systems: the role of leadership and developing an evaluative culture. The authors explain why these elements, which often receive less attention than the technical elements in building and strengthening M&E systems, carry such weight in sustaining national evaluation systems.

Keywords

Evaluation systems; Evaluation capacity development; Leadership; Evaluation culture; Evaluation management systems; Evaluation supply and demand

Metrics

Total abstract views: 3062
Total article views: 802


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.