Original Research
Developing South Africa’s national evaluation policy and system: First lessons learned
Submitted: 03 February 2015 | Published: 16 July 2015
About the author(s)
Ian Goldman, Evaluation and Research, Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, South AfricaJabulani E. Mathe, Evaluation and Research, Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, South Africa
Christel Jacob, Evaluation and Research, Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, South Africa
Antonio Hercules, Evaluation and Research, Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, South Africa
Matodzi Amisi, Evaluation and Research, Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, South Africa
Thabani Buthelezi, Department of Social Development, South Africa
Hersheela Narsee, Department of Higher Education and Training, South Africa
Stanley Ntakumba, Evaluation and Research, Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, South Africa
Mastoera Sadan, Evaluation and Research, Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, South Africa
Abstract
This article describes the development of the national evaluation system in South Africa, which has been implemented since 2012, led by the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME, previously the Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation) in the Presidency. It suggests emerging results but an evaluation of the evaluation being carried out in 2015 will address this formally. Responding to dissatisfaction with government services, in 2009 the government placed a major emphasis on monitoring and evaluation (M&E). A ministry and department were created, initially focusing on monitoring but in 2011 developing a national evaluation policy framework, which has been rolled out from 2012. The system has focused on improving performance, as well as improved accountability. Evaluations are proposed by national government departments and selected for a national evaluation plan. The relevant department implements the evaluations with the DPME and findings go to Cabinet and are made public. So far 39 evaluations have been completed or are underway, covering around R50 billion (approximately $5 billion) of government expenditure over a three-year expenditure framework. There is evidence that the first evaluations to be completed are having significant influence on the programmes concerned. The big challenge facing South Africa is to increase capacity of service providers and government staff so as to be able to have more and better quality evaluations taking place outside of as well as through the DPME.
Keywords
Metrics
Total abstract views: 14977Total article views: 23157
Crossref Citations
1. Evaluation culture and good governance: Is there a link?
Peter Dahler-Larsen, Adiilah Boodhoo
Evaluation vol: 25 issue: 3 first page: 277 year: 2019
doi: 10.1177/1356389018819110
2. Barriers to the Institutionalisation of outcome-based approaches in South Africa’s Public sector
Lesedi S. Matlala
Africa’s Public Service Delivery & Performance Review vol: 13 issue: 1 year: 2025
doi: 10.4102/apsdpr.v13i1.939
3. Reflecting on an impact evaluation of the Grade R programme: Method, results and policy responses
Marie-Louise Samuels, Stephen Taylor, Debra Shepherd, Servaas Van der Berg, Christel Jacob, Carol N. Deliwe, Thabo Mabogoane
African Evaluation Journal vol: 3 issue: 1 year: 2015
doi: 10.4102/aej.v3i1.139
4. Generating demand for and use of evaluation evidence in government health ministries: lessons from a pilot programme in Uganda and Zambia
Sophie Witter, Andrew Kardan, Molly Scott, Lucie Moore, Louise Shaxson
Health Research Policy and Systems vol: 15 issue: 1 year: 2017
doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0250-4
5. Examining stakeholder involvement in the evaluation process for program improvement
Edwin Ochieng Okul, Raphael Ondeko Nyonje
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478) vol: 9 issue: 5 first page: 179 year: 2020
doi: 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i5.835
6. How relationship and dialogue facilitate evidence use: Lessons from African countries
Matodzi M. Amisi, Mohammed S. Awal, Mine Pabari, Dede Bedu-Addo
African Evaluation Journal vol: 9 issue: 1 year: 2021
doi: 10.4102/aej.v9i1.559
7. Building the Capacity of Health Professionals in Monitoring and Evaluation in a Public Health Institution: Experience of the National Institute of Public Health (NIPH) of Côte d’Ivoire
Esme Marie Laure Essis, N’guetta Mathilde Manouan, Anna-Corine Estell Liema Bissouma, Ethmonia Kouamé, Ekissi Orsot Tetchi, Sagou Olivier Yayo, Stephane Claon, Yao Eugene Konan, William Yavo, Agbaya Stephane Oga, Tenenan Jean Marie Yeo, Joseph Aka
Health vol: 16 issue: 08 first page: 731 year: 2024
doi: 10.4236/health.2024.168051
8. How evidence, implementation, policy, and politics come together within evidence systems: Lessons from South Africa
Ruth Stewart
Development Policy Review vol: 41 issue: 2 year: 2023
doi: 10.1111/dpr.12657
9. Decolonising national evaluation systems
Ian Goldman, Candice Morkel, Edoé D. Agbodjan, Thokozile G. Molaiwa
African Evaluation Journal vol: 12 issue: 2 year: 2024
doi: 10.4102/aej.v12i2.731
10. An integrated model for increasing the use of evidence by decision-makers for improved development
Ruth Stewart, Laurenz Langer, Yvonne Erasmus
Development Southern Africa vol: 36 issue: 5 first page: 616 year: 2019
doi: 10.1080/0376835X.2018.1543579
11. Using co-creation to address monitoring and evaluation challenges: The experience of South Africa’s evaluation hackathon
Eleanor Hazell, Ian Goldman, Babette Rabie, Jen Norins, Takunda Chirau, Taruna Gupta
Evaluation vol: 30 issue: 1 first page: 82 year: 2024
doi: 10.1177/13563890231223174