Original Research

Reflecting on an impact evaluation of the Grade R programme: Method, results and policy responses

Marie-Louise Samuels, Stephen Taylor, Debra Shepherd, Servaas van der Berg, Christel Jacob, Carol N. Deliwe, Thabo Mabogoane
African Evaluation Journal | Vol 3, No 1 | a139 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/aej.v3i1.139 | © 2015 Marie-Louise Samuels, Stephen Taylor, Debra Shepherd, Servaas van der Berg, Christel Jacob, Carol N. Deliwe, Thabo Mabogoane | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 10 April 2015 | Published: 31 August 2015

About the author(s)

Marie-Louise Samuels, Early Childhood Development, Department of Basic Education, South Africa
Stephen Taylor, Researcher and Advisor, Department of Basic Education South Africa and Department of Economics, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Debra Shepherd, Department of Economics, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Servaas van der Berg, Department of Economics, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Christel Jacob, Director in the Evaluation and Research Unit, Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, South Africa
Carol N. Deliwe, Strategic Planning, Research and Coordination, Department of Basic Education, South Africa
Thabo Mabogoane, Outcomes Facilitator, Outcomes 1 and 5, Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation, South Africa

Abstract

This paper describes the expansion since 2001 of a public pre-school programme in South Africa known as ‘Grade R’, summarises the findings from an impact evaluation of the introduction of Grade R, discusses the policy recommendations flowing from the evaluation and reflects on the process of implementing the recommendations. The Grade R programme has expanded dramatically, to the point where participation is nearly universal. Although a substantial literature points to large potential benefits from pre-school educational opportunities, the impact evaluation reported on in this article demonstrated that the Grade R programme, as implemented until 2011, had a limited impact on later educational outcomes. Improving the quality of Grade R, especially in schools serving low socio-economic status communities, thus emerges as a key policy imperative. Recommended responses include professionalising Grade R teachers, providing practical in-service support, increasing access to appropriate storybooks, empowering teachers to assess the development of their learners, and improving financial record-keeping of Grade R expenditure by provincial education departments. The impact evaluation was initiated by the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME) and the Department of Basic Education (DBE), and was conducted by independent researchers. The move towards increased evaluation of key government programmes is important for shifting the focus of programme managers and policymakers towards programme outcomes rather than only programme inputs. Yet the process is not without its challenges: following a clear process to ensure the implementation of the lessons learned from such an evaluation is not necessarily straightforward.

 


Keywords

No related keywords in the metadata.

Metrics

Total abstract views: 11118
Total article views: 19630

 

Crossref Citations

1. Hierarchies of knowledge, incommensurabilities and silences in South African ECD policy: Whose knowledge counts?
Norma Rudolph
Journal of Pedagogy  vol: 8  issue: 1  first page: 77  year: 2017  
doi: 10.1515/jped-2017-0004

2. Revealing colonial power relations in early childhood policy making: An autoethnographic story on selective evidence
Norma Rudolph
Journal of Childhood, Education & Society  vol: 2  issue: 1  first page: 14  year: 2021  
doi: 10.37291/2717638X.20212158

3. A micro-level outcomes evaluation of a skills capacity intervention within the South African public service: Towards an impact evaluation
Petronella Jonck, Riaan De Coning, Paul S. Radikonyana
SA Journal of Human Resource Management  vol: 16  year: 2018  
doi: 10.4102/sajhrm.v16i0.1000

4. Grade R Teacher Expressions of Themselves as Teachers of Early Numeracy Participating in an Intervention Programme
Roxanne Long, Mellony Graven
African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education  vol: 27  issue: 3  first page: 273  year: 2023  
doi: 10.1080/18117295.2023.2224138

5. The pilot evaluation for the National Evaluation System in South Africa – A diagnostic review of early childhood development
Margot Davids, Marie-Louise Samuels, Roseline September, Tshimi L. Moeng, Linda Richter, Thabo W. Mabogoane, Ian Goldman, Thabani Buthelezi
African Evaluation Journal  vol: 3  issue: 1  year: 2015  
doi: 10.4102/aej.v3i1.141

6. Grade R educators voluntarily share their mathematics practices: Authentic realities in South Africa showcased
Faith Tlou, Nosisi N. Feza
South African Journal of Childhood Education  vol: 7  issue: 1  first page: 9  year: 2017  
doi: 10.4102/sajce.v7i1.468

7. Are There Long-Term Benefits from Early Childhood Education in Low- and Middle-Income Countries?
M. Najeeb Shafiq, Amanda Devercelli, Alexandria Valerio
SSRN Electronic Journal  year: 2018  
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3270603

8. Early Childhood Care and Education in Botswana: Implications for access and quality
Lebogang J. Pillar, Shanil J. Haricharan
South African Journal of Childhood Education  vol: 13  issue: 1  year: 2023  
doi: 10.4102/sajce.v13i1.1268

9. Implementing early childhood education for children with disabilities in South Africa and Kenya
Brigitte J. Clark, Willene A. Holness, Ruth T. Nyamadzawo, Dennis Moogi
African Journal of Disability  vol: 13  year: 2024  
doi: 10.4102/ajod.v13i0.1326

10. Tipping the scales: overcoming obstacles to support school readiness for all in low- and middle-income countries
Elizabeth Spier, Frederik Leenknecht, Kaitlin Carson, Krystal Bichay, Ann-Marie Faria
Early Years  vol: 39  issue: 3  first page: 229  year: 2019  
doi: 10.1080/09575146.2019.1576031